|
Introduction:
On November 18, 2007, The
Tennessean, had a front page article with the headline “Film
questions biblical justification for anti-gay views.” The
article was brief, merely letting the readers know of a new film
released in Nashville on November 19 that discusses what the Bible
says about homosexuality. However, a side-bar led readers to the
Issues section with a three-quarters front-page spread and further
article on the inside about the film. The story was titled “Does
the Bible always tell us so?” and it discussed the new film by
Daniel Karslake entitled For
the Bible Tells Me So. The film “explores the intersection
of biblical teachings and sexual orientation through the
experiences of people like U.S. Rep. Dick Gephardt, whose daughter
Chrissy is a lesbian, and the Rev. Gene Robinson, the nation’s
first openly gay Episcopal bishop.”
In essence, the point of the article and, reportedly, the film is
that the common understanding that the Bible is opposed to
homosexuality is actually the result of prooftexting, ripping
verses out of their biblical and historical contexts, and a
multi-generational smear campaign against homosexuality. In the
movie’s trailer, as seen at the website www.forthebibletellsmeso.org, while showing film of evangelists
speaking and just before showing President George W. Bush’s
declaration that marriage cannot be separated from its cultural
and religious roots, an unnamed commentator says, “Like Goebel
said, working for Hitler, you tell a lie enough times, the whole
world will believe it.” The same commentator later said in the
trailer, “For a long time the Bible has been misused to support
prejudice, apartheid, segregation, slavery, the second class
citizenship of women. Now it’s being misused to condemn gay
people. It’s an old trick. Fundamentalist Christians have been
using it throughout the ages and now they’re doing it again.”
This article and this movie beg us to ask the question,
“What exactly does the Bible tell us about homosexuality?” Is
it a sin? Is it only a sin in some forms? How should Christians
relate to homosexuals? Are Christians allowed to participate in
homosexuality? Will those who practice homosexuality be allowed
into the kingdom of heaven? What does the Bible tell us?
Discussion:
I.
The Bible tells us Jews are not allowed to practice
homosexuality.
A.
Leviticus
18:22
says, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an
abomination” (ESV). Leviticus
20:13 says, “If a man lies with a male as with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be
put to death; their blood is upon them.”
B.
The
Tennessean
tacitly deals with these passages by starting its article saying:
The
Bible says that eating shrimp is an abomination and that working
on the Sabbath is punishable by death. Not even the most devout
Christian, though, thinks twice about ordering shrimp scampi or
checking their office e-mail from home on a Sunday afternoon.
Biblical
literalists know that the customs and circumstances that gave rise
to such injunctions were rooted in historical and cultural
contexts very different from our own.
So
why do so many Christians cling to the handful of Scriptures that
cast aspersions on sexual relationships between people of the same
gender?
C.
We will ignore the fact that the author is unaware that the
Sabbath is Saturday and not Sunday. However we will point out that
he made the mistake so many make today. It is true that the Old
Covenant declared eating shrimp unlawful in Leviticus
11:10. Exodus
20:8-11 says the Jews must keep the Sabbath. The
article’s author says Christians do not worry about these laws
because of historical and cultural contexts. Apparently he
doesn’t understand the difference between the covenants.
According to Hebrews
7:12; 8:13, we are under a new covenant, not the old.
Christians do not have to follow the laws about shrimp and Sabbath
because we are not under that covenant. Therefore the fact that we
do not keep the Sabbath and the fact that we eat shrimp is not an
indication of inconsistency as this author is attempting to
suggest. It is a recognition of a new law and new covenant.
D.
With this in mind, it is true Christians cannot base their
view of homosexuality solely on these passages. We need to see
what the New Testament says. However, what we must note is the Old
Covenant said practicing homosexuality was unlawful. Further, we
must not accept the smoke screen offered by so many modern
proponents of homosexuality that this was only dealing with ritual
idol worship. Notice the context, these are lists of sexual sins,
not lists of idolatrous sins. Those who wish to be Jews must think
twice when they order shrimp scampi, when they answer office
e-mail on the Sabbath and before they decide to practice
homosexuality.
II.
The Bible tells us marriage and sexuality are to be between
a man and woman only.
A.
Hebrews
13:4
explains that marriage is honorable and the marriage bed is
undefiled. However, sexual immorality will be judged. The point is
sexual activity outside of marriage is immoral. I
Corinthians 7:1-4 demonstrates to avoid sexual immorality
a man must have a wife and a wife must have a husband. All else,
therefore, is unlawful.
B.
The
Tennessean
says:
Nowhere,
in fact, does the Bible say anything (sic),
much less condemn, loving and committed partnerships between
same-sex adults.
“Paul
never contemplated the monogamous, long-term sexual relationships
that take place among people today,” explained Jack Rogers,
former moderator of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.).
“There is no analogue for our contemporary understanding of
sexual identity in the Bible, neither for heterosexuals nor
homosexuals,” added Armour. “It’s simply not there.”
C.
Actually it is there. These guys just don’t like what it
says. It says that monogamous, long-term sexual relationships are
supposed to take place between a man and a woman who are married
and refuse to separate until death parts them. All else is sexual
immorality. I cannot pass by this point without making a
corollary. When people make these arguments, they are actually
arguing against the divine inspiration of Scripture. Their point
is that Paul didn’t understand the truth about homosexuality as
we have supposedly discovered through our modern scientific
endeavors. Since Paul wrote these passages, we are only seeing his
misunderstandings. However, if one believes the Bible actually
came from God, one cannot make these arguments at all. If God, who
created man and woman, is the originator of Scripture, then we
must recognize that God perfectly well understood everything about
our sexuality and knew exactly what homosexuality was and is. He
knew perfectly well how to teach against very specific forms of
homosexuality, but instead, in every case spoke in blanket terms
against it. He knew perfectly well what kind of sexuality we need
and He said, through Paul and other writers, one man, one woman
for life. You must recognize to make the argument this article
makes you have to deny inspiration.
III.
The Bible tells us homosexual behavior is contrary to
nature.
A.
Romans
1:26-27
says because the early Gentiles had exchanged the truth about God
for a lie, He gave them over to depravity which allowed them to
exchange the normal sexual function of the opposite gender for the
abnormal sexual function of the same gender. Note very carefully
that this passage mentions both men and women participating in
homosexual activity and both are declared unnatural.
B.
While the article doesn’t deal with this passage. I have
heard some of the modern arguments about it. The claim made by
some today is that Paul was unaware of the supposed hereditary
nature of homosexuality. Paul did not know, we are told, that
people are born homosexual. He was, supposedly, only condemning
those who were born naturally to be heterosexual participating in
homosexual activity. However, how does anyone claim to be born
homosexual? Is it not because of their desires to participate in
homosexual activity? If they have a strong desire, we are told
they must have been born that way. They have a different kind of
desire from the norm, so they must have been born an exception to
the norm.
C.
However, this passage does not merely speak against
practicing homosexuality; it also speaks against those who are
consumed with homosexual desire. Today, when people are consumed
with desire for one another, we are told they were born that way.
Paul actually condemns the very thing we are told about today.
Homosexuality is opposed to nature, according to the Bible.
IV.
The Bible tells us homosexuality is unlawful.
A.
According to I
Timothy 1:8-11, practicing homosexuality is linked with
being lawless and disobedient, ungodly and sinful, unholy and
profane. The passage goes on to say it is opposed to sound
doctrine and not in accord with the gospel of glory.
B.
Keep in mind what this means. This is not Christians being
judgmental. This is merely saying homosexual activity is unlawful
and sinful. We are not saying people cannot practice homosexuality
if they want. We are merely saying they can’t do it and be
righteous before God. If they participate in this activity, they
are sinning. Keep in mind we have to say this about a great many
things. In fact, if you are tempted by homosexual desires, please
do not act like we have somehow singled you out for judgment on
this issue. We have actually had to say this very thing about
every single one of us on one issue or another. As Ephesians
2:1-3 says, we have all been dead in trespasses and sins.
We have all been told that we must stop certain behaviors if we
wish to be righteous. No one thinks it is judgmental to tell
people they need to quit sleeping around if they want to be
righteous. No one thinks it is judgmental to tell people they have
to quit stealing, lying, murdering, coveting, etc. if they wish to
be righteous. If the sin with which you struggle is homosexuality,
we are not saying you have to stop to please us. We are simply
passing on that God says you have to stop if you wish to be
pleasing to Him.
V.
The Bible tells us those who practice homosexuality will
not inherit the kingdom of God.
A.
I
Corinthians 6:9-10
demonstrates that those who practice homosexuality, like those who
practice all sexual immorality, theft, greed or drunkenness will
not inherit the kingdom of God. The passage says this is
unrighteousness. Further, it encourages us not to be deceived. We
live in a society where it has become increasingly easy to be
deceived. We are told that many of those who practice
homosexuality are very moral. Perhaps they do not commit any other
immoralities, but the passage says homosexual activity is immoral
all by itself.
B.
The
Tennesseans
deal with this passage and the one in I
Timothy by saying:
Pronouncements
decrying prostitution in the first books of Corinthians and
Timothy likewise are not about sexual orientation but about the
exploitation of underage males, a practice tantamount to what we
now call human trafficking.
These
Scriptures address ritual wrong as opposed to something innately
immoral.
The
point being made is that these passages aren’t condemning all
homosexual behavior. Rather, we are supposed to believe Paul was
only dealing with two kinds of homosexuality here. One being the
use of young boys, sometimes even slaves. The other being the use
of homosexual activity in idol worship rituals. Paul couldn’t
possibly have been referring to someone being born that way or
someone being involved in a long-term relationship filled with
love.
C.
Later in the article, the author decries the awful approach
to Bible study called prooftexting, that is, pulling verses out of
their Biblical context to make them say what we want. They say
that in order to claim history says these two kinds of bad
homosexuality mentioned above were really the only one’s Paul
knew about and those were wrong. Had Paul known about real loving
homosexuality, he would have approved. Thus the historical context
makes these passages mean something other than what they seem to
say on the surface. If we were neglecting the historical or
biblical context of the passages and twisting them to say what we
want, we would be wrong. However, just as wrong is adding context
into the Biblical passages. Read them again and again and you see
nothing in the contexts that says Paul was only dealing with
prostitution, human trafficking or ritual homosexuality. These may
have been done in the first century and these passages would
condemn them. However, there is nothing either historically or
biblically that says these were the only forms of homosexuality
committed at the time of the Bible and there is nothing that says
these passages are limited to that. In fact, the first century
readers would have gotten from these verses exactly what we do.
Homosexual activity in every form is sinful and those who practice
it will not enter the kingdom of God.
VI.
The Bible tells us those who practice homosexual activity
can repent and change.
A.
I
Corinthians 6:9-11
says some of the Corinthians had been involved in the sins
mentioned, which included homosexuality. Then it says, “And such
were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you
were justified…” (ESV). Some of these Corinthians had
practiced homosexuality and yet when they became Christians, they
changed. Not that it was easy. It was probably very difficult, yet
they did it.
B.
Interestingly, people today act like homosexuality is
somehow different from every other sin in the world. They think
that because they have great desires and it is very hard to
change, they must have been born with it and it must be alright.
That is really the height of arrogance. In reality, that is how
every sin works. Consider Romans
7:7-25. This passage describes what all sin does. Whether
the sin is homosexuality or coveting, sin takes over. The person
will feel like there is absolutely nothing they can do to
overcome. They will want to act differently, but will repeatedly
commit sin. We all deal with different major sins in our lives.
Some deal with lust, some greed, some drinking, some coveting,
some gossiping, some sexual immorality, some theft, etc. We all,
in one sin or another, get to the point of saying, “Who will
deliver me from this body of death?” (Romans
7:24, ESV). And no matter the sin, there is only one
answer—Jesus Christ.
C.
Are we to assume that those who struggle with lying are
just born liars and it must be alright? What about those who are
hooked on pornography and sexual addicts? What about kleptomaniacs
and thieves? What about alcoholics and drug addicts? Are these, by
the mere fact that they are constantly pulled to their sins even
when they don’t want to, born that way and thus God wasn’t
dealing with those issues? Or are all sinners supposed to throw
themselves on the mercy of Jesus Christ and allow Him to cleanse
them of their sin and free them from it?
D.
I’m not saying ceasing homosexual activity is easy. I’m
not saying that once you have become entrapped by Satan’s
deceptions about it that you will ever be completely free from the
temptation of this sin. I’m simply saying that through Jesus
Christ, everyone can overcome any sin, including homosexuality.
E.
There is another point we must make here for those
Christians who do not struggle with homosexuality. What would we
do if someone came into our assembly and they confessed that
homosexuality was their struggle? Would we accept them if they
repented? Would we want to teach them? Everyone, no matter their
sin, needs Jesus. Jesus died for those whose sin is homosexuality
as much as He died for those whose sin is something else. Can we
love homosexuals enough to do more than vote against it? Can we
love them enough to take the gospel to them, pray with them,
support them as they struggle to turn from their sins? What would
we do when they confessed to us that they had fallen prey to their
temptation again, as most will? What do we want people to do when
we lied again, had an outburst of wrath again, coveted again,
lusted again, drank again, etc? If homosexuality is a sin that
people can change, then we must be willing to help them change and
be patient as they go through the change process. We must not look
on this sin as if it is somehow worse than our own sins. We must
look on it as a sin, plain and simple, just like ours and be
willing to help just as we want others to help us.
Conclusion:
The Bible is clear. People can add in context, they can
twist and distort all they want, however, they won’t change what
the Bible clearly says. Homosexuality is a sin and no one who
practices it impenitently will enter the kingdom of God. This is
not being judgmental, this is simply stating what the Judge says.
Whatever your sin, whether homosexuality, coveting, lying,
gossiping, sexual immorality, bitterness, outbursts of wrath or
whatever, turn to Jesus for forgiveness and freedom today. We are
here to help no matter what sin you have faced and struggle with.
Please simply remember this. You can speak against me. You can
call me names. You can tell all kinds of emotional stories about
people in all kinds of different situations, but you can’t
change what the Bible tells us. You can’t change what the Judge
said. You can throw out the Bible if you want, but you just
can’t make it say homosexuality is lawful no matter how loving
or long-term it is. We will all stand before the Judge one day and
our twisting of His word will not change what He is going to say.
Let us all be honest with the text and turn ourselves over to
Jesus.
Ryan Underwood, The
Tennessean, November 18, 2007, “Film questions biblical
justification for anti-gay views”, p 1.
Bill Friskics-Warren, The
Tennessean, November 18, 2007, “Does the Bible always
tell us so?”, p 21A.
Glory
to God in the church by Christ Jesus
Franklin
Church of Christ
|
|