|
A Monday Morning Supper?
It is becoming increasingly common to hear people go to Acts
20:11 to claim authority for taking the Lord’s Supper on
some day other than the first day of the week. The argument is
they gathered together to break bread on the first day of the
week, but Paul preached until midnight. Then Eutychus fell out of
the window and Paul raised him. By now it is early Monday morning.
Then he went back up and they broke bread. Thus, they partook of
the Supper on Monday.
However, as is often the case, when we
examine the nouns and pronouns Luke employed, we see a completely
different picture. Read Acts
20:7, 11 very carefully and notice the nouns and pronouns.
I have bolded the important ones so you can more readily see them:
On the first day of the
week, when we were
gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them,
intending to depart on the next day, and he
prolonged his speech until midnight…And when Paul had gone up and had broken bread and eaten, he conversed with
them a long while, until daybreak, and so departed.
Notice who gathered to break bread
together. “We” did. That is, Luke and the others with Paul
and, presumably, the disciples of Troas gathered together on the
first day of the week to break bread.
However, who broke bread in Acts
20:11. Not “we” but Paul. Paul broke bread in that
second passage. Did Paul take the Lord’s Supper alone? No.
Rather, “we” gathered on the first day of the week to break
bread and “we” did exactly what we gathered to do. Then Paul
began to preach to them and went quite long. And why not? He was
planning to depart in the morning. He must have had a great many
things to say to them before he left. This would be his last
opportunity to say them.
Then Eutychus fell out of the window
and died. As you could imagine, that was an assembly stopper. At
this point, Luke and the others head off for the ship to sail
ahead of Paul (cf. Acts
20:13). Paul, however, went back up to converse with the
Troas brethren. When he went back up, he ate.
Some mock that idea because they find
it odd that he would have a meal at such a late hour. But in
reality, it was a natural thing. He wasn’t just going to the
ship. He was going on a long walk to Assos to meet the others. He
would need nourishment to prepare for his long journey. So they
fed him.
This second breaking of bread was not the Supper but rather
a benevolent meal preparing Paul for his long walk as he talked to
them until daybreak. Therefore, this falls far short of providing
any authority to take the Supper on any day other than the first
day of the week.
Edwin L. Crozier
|